McGregor v. Bd. of Trs. of Burlingame
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Mandamus to the Trustees of Burlingame, and for Writ of Prohibition to the Superior Court of San Mateo County, George H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The first of the above entitled matters is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the board of trustees of the town of Burlingame to hear and determine an alleged contest of an election. The second is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court of San Mateo County from proceeding with the trial of a contest of the same election. Both proceedings were transferred to this court after judgment (denying the relief sought) in the district court of appeal for the first appellate district, to which court the applications had first been presented.
Burlingame is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Johnson v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Nicholls v. BarrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- People ex rel. Keeler v. RobertsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Lamb v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hopkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- County of Sutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Spitzer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.