Legal Opinion

Summerfield v. Dow

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1907No. Civ. No. 397Published

PETITION for writ of mandate to the auditor of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Petition for writ of mandate. Petitioner is a justice of the peace for Los Angeles township, Los Angeles county. Respondent is the auditor of Los Angeles county.

On May 11, 1907,. petitioner demanded of respondent that he draw a warrant upon the treasurer of Los Angeles county for $250, payable to petitioner as his salary for the month of April, 1907, under the provisions of subdivision 15 of section 4231 of the Political Code as amended March 18, 1907. (Stats. 1907, p. 424.) Respondent refused to issue said warrant, and, as cause why the mandate of this court should not issue commanding him…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rode v. SiebeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Longan v. County of SolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Tulare County v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Vail v. San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Johnson v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API