Legal Opinion
Schenkman v. Dole
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ellerin, J.
Petitioners, residents of the third-floor unit at the subject premises, 102 West 14th Street, submitted an application to the New York City Loft Board seeking coverage pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law article 7-C, commonly referred to as the Loft Law, claiming that the premises qualified for protection as an "interim multiple dwelling” (IMD) as defined by *118that statute. At issue on this appeal is the propriety of the Loft Board’s denial of that application.
The criteria necessary for a building to qualify as an "interim multiple dwelling” subject to the Loft Law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sled Hill Cafe, Inc. v. HostetterNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kaufman v. American Electrofax Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ancona v. MetcalfCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- 300 Bowery, Inc. v. Bass & Bass, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Azizfard Trading Co. v. SmiloviciAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vink v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Brynhildur Thorgeirsdottir v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Madeline D'Anthony Enterprises, Inc. v. SokolowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Madeline D'Anthony Enterprises, Inc. v. SokolowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012