Madeline D'Anthony Enterprises, Inc. v. Sokolowsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant Sokolowsky occupies a unit on the 5th floor of the building. His lease, effective September 1, 2007, states that the premises were to be used as an office and that he resided elsewhere.
Effective June 21, 2010, the Loft Law was amended to add *607Multiple Dwelling Law § 281 (5) (L 2010, ch 147, § 1), which created a new qualifying window period under which residential units may qualify for coverage as IMDs. Section 281 (5) defines an IMD as any building that: (1) at any time was occupied for manufacturing, commercial, or warehouse purposes; (2) lacks a certificate of compliance or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. BaidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Smith v. Johnson Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kaufman v. American Electrofax Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.