Legal Opinion
Ancona v. Metcalf
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 11, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kristin Booth Glen, J.
The question of first impression presented in this case is whether a mixed-use building may be classified as an “interim multiple dwelling” (IMD) under the new Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling LaWj art 7-C) when the owner has already obtained a residential certificate of occupancy for two of the building’s dwelling units.
This issue arises in the context of a summary holdover proceeding. Jack Ancona, the petitioner landlord commenced this proceeding against Mary Jane Metcalf, the respondent tenant, to recover use and occupancy and regain possession of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Corris v. 129 Front Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- MATTER OF LEFKOWITZ v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lefkowitz v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- State v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blackgold Realty Corp. v. MilneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- 99 Commercial Street, Inc. v. LlewellynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Association of Commercial Property Owners, Inc. v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re MillanNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Schenkman v. DoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.