Legal Opinion

Wermeling v. Shattuck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1950No. Appeal, No. 103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

As a result of a collision between tbe plaintiff’s sedan and a pickup truck owned by tbe defendant company and operated by defendant Sbattuck on tbe company’s business, tbe plaintiff brought tbis suit against tbe owner and driver of tbe truck, jointly, to recover damages for tbe personal injuries which he sustained in tbe accident. Tbe jury returned a money verdict for the plaintiff. Tbe defendants filed motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.v. Tbe court below, being of tbe opinion that tbe plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Landis v. Conestoga Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Majewski v. LempkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wermeling v. SHATTUCKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API