Dupont v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Manchester (board), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal by the plaintiff property owner, Lawrence J. Dupont, from the board’s denial of the plaintiffs appli*328cation for a variance. On appeal, the board claims that the court improperly (1) found that the claimed hardship at issue was not created by the plaintiff and (2) substituted its judgment for that of the board in finding that there was a valid hardship necessitating the granting of the application for a variance. We agree with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Aitken v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Kelly v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Horace v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Jersey v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF DERBYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.