Legal Opinion

Dupont v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 2, 2003No. AC 23710PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Manchester (board), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal by the plaintiff property owner, Lawrence J. Dupont, from the board’s denial of the plaintiffs appli*328cation for a variance. On appeal, the board claims that the court improperly (1) found that the claimed hardship at issue was not created by the plaintiff and (2) substituted its judgment for that of the board in finding that there was a valid hardship necessitating the granting of the application for a variance. We agree with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Aitken v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Kelly v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Horace v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Jersey v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF DERBYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API