Legal Opinion

In Re Grain Land Coop

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1997No. Civil 3-96-1209PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment brought by Grain Land Coop, Michael Christensen, and Joseph Burke. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part the parties’ motion.

BACKGROUND

While the parties to this action find little common ground for agreement, the following factual recitation relates predominantly undisputed allegations. To the extent that the parties disagree about these facts, the disputes are not material to the disposition of the present motion. At all times…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lowell E. Harter and Doretta Harter v. Iowa Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Grain Land Coop v. Kar Kim Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. AKA Distributing Company v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Lachmund v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API