Legal Opinion

Gruber v. Gruber

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 27, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only question in this case is whether or not if defendant were afflicted with epilepsy at and before the time of his marriage to petitioner, knew it and represented to her that he had it not or concealed the fact from her, it was such a fraud as would entitle her to a decree annulling the marriage under the general equity jurisdiction of this court. It has been held that tuberculosis is such a cause. Davis v. Davis, 90 N.J. Eq. 158. Also syphilis. Crane v. Crane, 62 N.J. Eq. 21.

In Carris v. Carris, 24 N.J. Eq. 516, the court of errors and appeals held that the court of chancery, under its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. Bolmer v. EdsallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  3. Steerman v. SnowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  4. Ysern v. HorterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  5. Carris v. CarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Costello v. PorzeltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Houlahan v. HorzepaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Buechler v. SimonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Rhoades v. RhoadesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API