Legal Opinion
Houlahan v. Horzepa
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 4, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
46 N.J. Super. 583 (1957)
135 A.2d 232
JOHN B. HOULAHAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPHINE HORZEPA, FALSELY CALLED JOSEPHINE HOULAHAN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided October 4, 1957.
Messrs. Turp & Coates, attorneys for plaintiff.
Mr. George Warren, guardian ad litem for defendant, pro se.
MARIANO, J.S.C.
This is a suit for the annulment of a consummated marriage on the grounds that at the time of the ceremony the defendant was incapable of consenting thereto, and also for fraudulent concealment of mental illness. The defendant is represented by duly appointed guardian ad…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lyon v. LyonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Bolmer v. EdsallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Lindquist v. LindquistNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Steerman v. SnowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Romatz v. RomatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Melia v. MeliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Lopez v. LopezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Craun v. CraunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- Craun v. CraunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.