Legal Opinion

Hastie v. Jenkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1909No. 7453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Steiner, J., entered October 5, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to enjoin the obstruction of a water course, and for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

The plaintiffs in the above entitled causes brought three separate actions in the superior court of Douglas county, against the above-named defendants, primarily for a mandatory injunction and for damages incident to the wrong sought to be redressed by the action. By consent of all parties, the cases were consolidated. The plaintiffs were all owners of lands in the Grand Coulee, in Douglas county, Washington, and the gist of the three actions was the same and, as the appellants contend, was based upon the same facts, which were set out in four paragraphs of each of the complaints, as follows:

“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Madson v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Treat v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Winsor v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Island County v. MacKieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Miller v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Trigg v. TimmermanWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. City of Independence Ex Rel. Flournoy v. DickinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Deruwe v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API