Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,099PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Cloud district court; John C. Hogin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

'This case was before the court on the occasion of a former appeal. (Bailey v. Kelly, 86 Kan. 911, 122 Pac. 1027.) The action was commenced against a landlord to recover damages resulting from the death of his tenant’s servant who fell into a defectively covered cistern on the leased premises. The cistern was in a shed in the rear of the kitchen of a building used as a restaurant. The defect in the covering of the cistern existed at the time the premises were leased, was open to view, and the character of the covering was observed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. DeTarr v. Ferd. Heim Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Aaron v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Steele v. LatimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API