Legal Opinion

Steele v. Latimer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1974No. 47,141PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

Shirley Steele brings this action on behalf of herself and her six young children against Marvin E. Latimer, their landlord, seeking to recover rent paid, to recover damages and to enjoin violation of the Wichita Housing Code. We shall refer to the parties either as plaintiffs and defendant, or by name.

The trial court, hearing the case without a jury, ruled that Shirley Steele was the only proper party plaintiff; that the defendant had violated the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment in failing to repair a broken water main; and that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marini v. IrelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Mease Ex Rel. Oliver v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Lemle v. BreedenHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API