Legal Opinion

State v. Westfall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 2001No. 98CR3169FE; A112499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

In this prosecution for drug, theft, firearm, and forgery-related offenses, the state appeals from an order suppressing evidence on the ground that, with respect to certain items, the warrant authorizing the search of defendant’s hotel room and vehicles was unsupported by probable cause. ORS 138.060(3). Defendant cross-assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to controvert information contained in the search warrant affidavit. We reverse and remand.

On October 26, 1998, Douglas County Sheriffs Office Deputy Bradbum executed an affidavit in support of an application for a warrant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. ClapperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. TropeanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API