Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Al Johnson Construction Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 64-661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs have brought suit against Meldahl Dam Constructors (Meldahl), a joint venture. Although the caption of the complaint and the brief submitted by plaintiffs confusingly indicated that they had named as defendants, A1 Johnson Construction Co. and Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co., trading as Meldahl, counsel for movant demonstrated at argument that plaintiffs were suing only Meldahl and not the two corporate members of the joint venture. Counsel for plaintiffs conceded that this was so.1 Accordingly, I will treat the names of the two companies appearing in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  4. Carson Construction Co. v. Fuller-Webb ConstructionDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961
  5. Feldmann Insurance Agency v. BrodskyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fox-Keller, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Marchwinski v. Oliver Tyrone Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API