Legal Opinion

Fox-Keller, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-789PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ARTSDALEN, District Judge.

Defendant, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S. A., Inc., has moved to dismiss this action against it for lack of proper venue. The motion will be granted without prejudice to an application for a change of venue being filed within ten days.

The complaint alleges that defendants violated several provisions of the antitrust laws (15 U.S.C.A. § 1, 13(e) and 14 (1955)); refused to deal in good faith with plaintiff as required by “The Automobile Dealers Day in Court Act” (15 U.S.C.A. § 1222 (1956)); and breach of contract.

Action was originally…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. MaloneySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Automobile Body Research CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  5. Block v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  4. Farmers Bank of State of Del. v. Bell Mtg. Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  5. Hodson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API