Commercial National Bank v. Schlitz
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action to quiet title. Findings and judgment were in favor of defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was granted, and defendant appeals from the order.
Defendant urges that there was. no proper hill of exceptions before the trial court on which to base a motion for a new trial, for the reason that the notice of intention was not filed in time. The notice of decision was served on plaintiff’s counsel April 17, 1905. Notice of intention to move for a new trial was likewise served on April 24, 1905, but it is claimed by defendant that it was not filed with the clerk until May 27,1905.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Keane v. CannovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Stewart v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Zubieta v. TarnerNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- C & F REALTY CORPORATION v. MershonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.