Legal Opinion
Oklahoma ex rel. Wilson v. Blankenship
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 31, 1969No. Civ. No. 69-73PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOHANON, Chief Judge.
This civil action was originally filed in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, and timely removed to this Court. The plaintiff instituted the action as a citizen and taxpayer under the provisions of §§ 372 and 373 of Title 62 O.S.1961, authorizing taxpayers, under certain conditions, to institute suits on behalf of the State. Plaintiff in his Amended Complaint charges that the defendants, and each of them, entered into *872an unlawful and joint agreement to reduce the amount of a judgment theretofore obtained by the State of Oklahoma against the defendants,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- United States v. EllicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lewis v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oklahoma ex rel. Wilson v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. J. Woodrow Wilson v. G. T. Blankenship, Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. J. Woodrow Wilson v. G. T. Blankenship, Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, and Riffe Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971