Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Wilson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 5, 1894No. 208PublishedCited by 32 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIROUIT COÜRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. The facts in this case were as follows : Plaintiff in error, the plaintiff below, brought suit against the defendants to recover damages for libel. • At the December (1887) term and on April 9, 1888, a jury returned a verdict in his favor, assessing the damages at $10,000. On April 16, 1888, the defendants filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages were excessive.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIROUIT COÜRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. The facts in this case were as follows : Plaintiff in error, the plaintiff below, brought suit against the defendants to recover damages for libel. • At the December (1887) term and on April 9, 1888, a jury returned a verdict in his favor, assessing the damages at $10,000. On April 16, 1888, the defendants filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages were excessive. After the entry of this motion the following appears of record : “ Edward H. Lewis Geo. O. Wilson et al. ) “ After the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer

This is a most extraordinary case. Nearly two years after a judgment has been formally entered, and after the plaintiff has received payment and acknowledged full satisfaction, he comes in and moves the court to enter, a new judgment in double the amount, and on the denial of such motion brings the matter here on error. His contention is that, under the practice in Florida, the court had no power to grant a new trial upon a motion made more than four days after a verdict; that-the recital-of all that the court said from the bench, as to the amount of 'damages, and its purpose to grant a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Call Carl, Inc. v. BP Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  3. Nam v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Turner v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Cloverfields Improvement Ass'n v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API