Legal Opinion
Oklahoma ex rel. Wilson v. Blankenship
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1971No. Nos. 218-70, 219-70PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a jurisdictional conflict between the state and federal courts in the Western District of Oklahoma. An action was filed in state court and was subsequently removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b).1 Following removal the plaintiff filed a motion to remand and this was denied. Thereafter, the several defendants filed *689a motion for summary judgment on the merits of the ease and this motion was granted. The trial court, 308 F.Supp. 870, determined that the removed action was ancillary to the prior suit which had been tried and in which judgment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roy E. Fajen v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Madsen v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- North Davis Bank v. First National Bank of LaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Standard Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.