Legal Opinion

Elsevier, Inc. v. Grossman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 5, 2015No. 12 Civ. 5121(KPF)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge.

From 2003 to 2011, Defendants Pierre Grossman (“Grossman”), IBIS Corp. (“IBIS”), Publicares Técnicas Interna-cioriais (“PTI”), and various “John Doe” Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) purchased subscriptions from Plaintiff Elsevier, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Elsevier”), a publisher of scientific, technical, and medical journals. Defendants allegedly purchased 50 of these subscriptions at low-priced, “individual” subscription rates, while promising that they would not resell the subscriptions to entities that would otherwise pay…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. BWP Media USA, Inc. v. Gossip Cop Media, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Ingenito v. Riri USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. Bissonnette v. PodlaskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Elsevier, Inc. v. GrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API