Legal Opinion
Ingenito v. Riri USA, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 3, 2015No. 11-CV-2569 (MKB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge:
Plaintiff Loredana Ingénito brings the above-captioned action against Defendants Riri USA, Inc. (“Riri USA”), Benjamin Howell, II, Riri SA and Riri Group, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended by the Pregnancy Act of 1978 (“PDA”), and the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”). Riri SA and Riri Group (collectively, “Movants”) moved to dismiss Plaintiffs claims pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thackurdeen v. Duke Univ.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Dacosta v. City of N.Y.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Clean Coal Techs., Inc. v. Leidos, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Winner v. Tryko Partners, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Alexander Wilson, Ronald Bishop, and Gable Schneider, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 52District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.