Summa Four, Inc. v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Summa Four, Inc. (“Summa Four”) filed this patent infringement action against Clair-com Communications Group, Inc. d/b/a AT & T Wireless Services, Aviation Communications Division (“Claireom”) and its parent company, AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT & T Wireless”) alleging Claireom has directly infringed, and actively induced the infringement of, its United States Patent No. 5,553,135 (“ ’135 Patent”). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
Summa Four and Claircom are also currently involved in a state court proceeding in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Applera Corp.-Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Sanitec Industries, Inc. v. Sanitec Worldwide, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010