Legal Opinion

Summa Four, Inc. v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 13, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-335 MMSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

Summa Four, Inc. (“Summa Four”) filed this patent infringement action against Clair-com Communications Group, Inc. d/b/a AT & T Wireless Services, Aviation Communications Division (“Claireom”) and its parent company, AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT & T Wireless”) alleging Claireom has directly infringed, and actively induced the infringement of, its United States Patent No. 5,553,135 (“ ’135 Patent”). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).

Summa Four and Claircom are also currently involved in a state court proceeding in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Applera Corp.-Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
  2. Sanitec Industries, Inc. v. Sanitec Worldwide, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
  3. Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API