Legal Opinion

Wray v. Pennington

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1956No. 6076PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIKER, Justice.

In this case plaintiff alleged that, of her property, defendant had converted to his own use, by sale thereof, one automobile of the value of $2,400. Plaintiff asked judgment for that amount and for costs of suit.

Defendant, answering, denied all material allegations of plaintiff’s complaint; and alleged affirmatively that he was the owner of the automobile in question at the time of its sale by him. The court entered judgment for the plaintiff and defendant has appealed.

The facts in this case, as found by the trial court, are: Herman W. Pennington and plaintiff, Leola Wray,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hocken v. Allstate InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Quintana v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ross v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Johnson v. FlowersUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. McCoy v. Northwestern Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fox v. DoakNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. SandersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Stone v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nance v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Mine Supply, Incorporated v. Elayer CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API