Legal Opinion
Nance v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1969No. 261PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendant’s conviction of armed robbery was affirmed on appeal. State v. Nance, 77 N.M. 39, 419 P.2d 242 (1966).
He is now before this court on appeal from an order denying, without hearing, his motion filed pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1967)]. He relies upon four points for reversal.
He first attacks the trial court’s findings 3 and 5, which are as follows:
“3. The issue of whether this court committed error in denying Petitioner’s motion for instructed verdict at the close of the State’ [sic] case and again at the conslusion [sic] of all of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- State v. SelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Herring v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Miller v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Williams v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.