Hocken v. Allstate Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
This is a proceeding by garnishment under an execution upon a judgment rendered in favor of the appellant, Emma Hocken, and against Ernest L. Neef. Garnishees (respondents herein) are the Allstate Insurance Company, a corporation, and Allstate Fire Insurance Company, a corporation. Originally there Avere two separate garnishment suits, one against each of the above named garnishees, but these suits were, prior to trial, consolidated. The appeal is from a judgment of dismissal, after the trial court had sustained garnishees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, so that the question presented…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Bailey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Ross v. American Employers' Liability InsuranceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
- Goerss v. the Indemnity Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Storm v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- La Presto v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Sobina v. BusbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Corder v. Morgan Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Allstate Insurance Company v. WarrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.