Legal Opinion

Hocken v. Allstate Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1941PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This is a proceeding by garnishment under an execution upon a judgment rendered in favor of the appellant, Emma Hocken, and against Ernest L. Neef. Garnishees (respondents herein) are the Allstate Insurance Company, a corporation, and Allstate Fire Insurance Company, a corporation. Originally there Avere two separate garnishment suits, one against each of the above named garnishees, but these suits were, prior to trial, consolidated. The appeal is from a judgment of dismissal, after the trial court had sustained garnishees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, so that the question presented…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Bailey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Ross v. American Employers' Liability InsuranceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  5. Goerss v. the Indemnity Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Storm v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  2. La Presto v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Sobina v. BusbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Corder v. Morgan Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. WarrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API