Legal Opinion
Wolpe v. Poretsky
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 19, 1944No. 8546PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Associate Justice.
Appellee, Harry Poretsky, brought suit in the court below to enjoin members of the Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia from carrying into effect a zoning order regularly adopted after public hearing as required by law. At the close of a trial on the merits the court found that the action of the Zoning Commission in adopting the zoning order in question was arbitrary, capricious and void. The order of the court below enjoined the Commissioners from enforcing the zoning order and directed them to restore the parcel of land involved in this suit to the zoning…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.