Legal Opinion

United States v. Adames

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 31, 1986No. 49327; CM 443150PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of military judge alone. Charge I, laid under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, contained three specifications which were identical in language with the three specifications of Charge II, laid under Article 133, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 933. On defense motion, two specifications of Charge I and one specification of Charge II were dismissed on the ground of multiplicity.

After hearing the evidence, the judge convicted Lieutenant Adames under Article 134 of committing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. JohannsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. MayfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. TedderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. HendersonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. ClarkeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. WoodardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. SerinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API