Legal Opinion

Bryce v. O'BRIEN

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1936No. L. A. 15195PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The action is one to quiet title to real property, and involves the rights of the respective parties as to claims arising under a forged, deed, one signed by plaintiff but placed in the hands of another party with the name of the grantee left blank. Plaintiff, an elderly widow, was induced by one Ruark to execute a blank deed covering certain real property in order, he suggested to plaintiff, to facilitate his efforts in arranging its exchange for certain bonds. Instead, the document was improperly used, and the name of the defendant, O’Brien, a partner of Ruark, was inserted therein. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trout v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. SkeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Moore v. StellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Andre Flowers v. DancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API