Derby & Co., Inc. v. Seaview Petroleum Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Defendant Seaview Petroleum Company moves for summary judgment on the ground that there is no evidence to support plaintiff’s claims for negligence, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. In the alternative, in a supplemental motion for summary judgment, Seaview avers that Derby’s complaint is barred by New Jersey’s Entire Controversy Doctrine. There is no merit in either motion and both will be denied.
I. Facts
In early January, 1981, Derby contracted to sell Seaview a quantity of Libyan Amna crude oil. To meet its obligations to Sea-view, Derby…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Ajamian v. SchlangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. Lexington Insurance Company v. Affiliated Risk Control Administrators of Pennsylvania, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aetna Insurance Company, Cigna Companies and Johnson & Higgins of Pennsylvania, Inc. And Alexander & Alexander, Inc. And Duane Morris & Heckscher, a Pennsylvania Partnership and McCabe James J. Esquire Individually and Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Navient CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Frazier v. W. Union Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Cahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003