Legal Opinion
Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2012No. 11-6233PublishedCited by 227 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHESON, Circuit Judge.
Gayen Hancock, David Cross, Montez Mutzig, and James Bollinger (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek to represent a class of customers dissatisfied with “U-verse,” a digital telecommunications service. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed their claims based on forum selection and arbitration clauses in the U-verse terms of service. Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their claims.
Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual History
1. U-verse and Terms of Service
U-verse is the brand name for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Milk 'N' More, Inc., a Corporation v. Jack D. BeavertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- Birch v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Christina Bazemore v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Deb v. Sirva, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Gary Sgouros v. TransUnion CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Howard v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.