Legal Opinion
Towns of Concord, Norwood, and Wellesley, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 11, 1992No. 19-7043PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
The Towns of Concord and Wellesley, Massachusetts, receive most of their power requirements from the Boston Edison Company. Until 1985, so did the neighboring Town of Norwood. Boston Edison purchased some of its power from regional nuclear power companies. Between 1973 and 1986, those companies imposed on Boston Edison certain charges relating to the storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Boston Edison passed these charges on to the Towns, improperly it concedes, without prior approval from the Federal Energy…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Koch Gateway Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Kiyemba v. ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Maine v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.