Legal Opinion
Reed & Steven v. HIP Health Plan of Florida, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided October 7, 1999No. 996241CIVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HIGHSMITH, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Barry L. Gar-ber on September 7, 1999. Having conducted a de novo review of this matter, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Garber’s Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in its entirety. Accordingly, it is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the United States’ motion for summary judgment (D.E.# 5) is GRANTED IN PART, only to the extent of declaring that the federal tax hens against the settlement funds in this action have priority over the writ…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hussain v. Boston Old Colony InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Hussain v. Boston Old Colony InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
- Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L. L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L.L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L. L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017