Legal Opinion

Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L. L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2017No. 105287PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Progressive Max Insurance Company ("Progressive"), appeals from the trial court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Kisling, Nestico & Redick ("KNR"). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 2014, Todd Anthony Thornton ("Thornton") and Darvale Thomas ("Thomas") were involved in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident, Thornton was insured with Progressive. Thomas retained the law firm of KNR to represent him for all claims arising from the accident. Thomas and KNR entered into a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cohen v. GoldbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L.L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API