Legal Opinion

Pro Arts, Inc. v. K Mart Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 30, 1984No. C 82-916 APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

This action arises out of alleged contractual relationships between plaintiff Pro Arts, Inc. (Pro Arts) and defendant K Mart Corporation (K Mart). The original complaint named as defendants K Mart, Great Western Graphics, and an individual named Don Edel. The complaint raised various breach of contract, antitrust, and fraud claims. Each of the defendants moved to dismiss. Pro Arts then voluntarily dismissed defendants Great Western Graphics and Don Edel and amended its complaint. K Mart, the Only remaining defendant, has renewed its motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. National Egg Co. v. Bank Leumi Le-Israel B.M.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  3. Philco-Ford Corporation v. AbeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Mills v. MillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Columbus Trade Exchange, Inc. v. AMCA International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. Shepherd v. WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API