Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Jones

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 6, 2019No. SJC-12564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurrence

LENK, J. (concurring).

*721I write separately because, unlike the court, I think that compelled decryption of a cellular telephone or comparable device implicates more than just its passcode; what the government seeks is access to the files on the device, which the government believes will aid in inculpating the defendant. Given that the foregone conclusion doctrine is a narrow exception to the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, the government may compel a defendant's decryption of such a device only when it can show that any testimonial aspect involved in that act of production…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. United States v. HubbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, USA v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API