Commonwealth v. Jones
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Concurrence
LENK, J. (concurring).
*721I write separately because, unlike the court, I think that compelled decryption of a cellular telephone or comparable device implicates more than just its passcode; what the government seeks is access to the files on the device, which the government believes will aid in inculpating the defendant. Given that the foregone conclusion doctrine is a narrow exception to the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, the government may compel a defendant's decryption of such a device only when it can show that any testimonial aspect involved in that act of production…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. HubbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, USA v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019