Legal Opinion

United States v. Bright

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2010No. 07-17027, 08-16912, 08-16913PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from having to disclose documents when the very act of production would constitute self-incrimination. Cherie and Benjamin Bright (the Brights), subjects of an Internal Revenue Service investigation concerning past tax liability, jointly appeal the district court’s order enforcing IRS summonses requiring production of documents, including those relating to offshore accounts. The Brights invoked their Fifth Amendment privilege and refused production. They also separately appeal the district court’s subsequent order finding them in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. $133,420.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. M.H. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. GelfgattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API