Legal Opinion

In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, USA v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 23, 2012No. 11-12268, 11-15421PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal of a judgment of civil contempt. On April 7, 2011, John Doe was served with a subpoena duces tecum requiring him to appear before a Northern District of Florida grand jury and produce the unencrypted contents located on the hard drives of Doe’s laptop computers and five external hard drives. 1 Doe informed the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida that, when he appeared before the grand jury, he would invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to comply with the subpoena. 2 Because the Government…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Dontavious M. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Apple Macpro Computer Apple MaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. State v. StahlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Sallah v. Worldwide Clearing LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API