Legal Opinion

Parlier v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

We think the court below erred in granting defendants’ motion to nonsuit.

The promise made by E. B. Miller (defendants’ intestate) to J. E. Brown to pay W. W. Parlier the notes of $300 that Brown owed Par-lier under the facts in the case, if true, was a binding contract, founded on a valuable consideration and enforceable. J. F. Brown owed W. W. Parlier $300 and interest, balance of purchase-money of- land that was deeded to himself and wife by Parlier and wife. He gave. Parlier a mortgage on the land to secure the $300- — three bonds of $100 each. When J. F. Brown and his wife conveyed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Rector v. . LydaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Woodcock v. . BosticSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Canestrino v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Wadford v. . GilletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Keller v. . ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Brown v. Bowers Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API