Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Marshall
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1956No. Civ. 21251PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
By her complaint, plaintiff seeks to quiet title to certain real property. She appeals from a judgment decreeing that the defendants are each the owner of an undivided one-fifth interest in the property, subject only to a life estate in her.
The following facts are supported by substantial evidence: In April, 1951, plaintiff signed a grant deed conveying to her five granddaughters, including the three defendants, the property in question, but reserved to herself a life estate therein. The deed was executed in the presence of her son and her attorney who, as a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- De Levillain v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Estate of HobartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Zurich American Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Giovannini v. TurriettaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Asisten v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.