Legal Opinion

Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insur

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 30, 2013No. 12-35346, 12-35454PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (“CERCLA”), establishes a retroactive strict liability regime that imposes joint and several liability upon past and current landowners or operators of properties or facilities from which hazardous substances have been released or disposed into the environment. Plaintiff-Appellee Anderson Brothers, Inc., (“Anderson”) received two letters from the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) notifying Anderson of its potential liability under CERCLA for environmental…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Federal Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Factory Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peri Formworks Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  4. Pacific Hide & Fur Depot v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
  5. McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corporation v. the Phoenix Insurance Company and the Travelers Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API