Legal Opinion
Koehn v. State Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1958No. S. F. 19780PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The respondents have moved to dismiss the appeal taken by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board on the ground that the appeals board is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of section 938 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is not entitled to appeal.
On August 20, 1953, the State Board of Equalization dismissed an accusation filed by M. M. Koehn against E. L. Ledger, the holder of certain liquor licenses, and directed that the order become effective on September 21. Koehn filed a petition for reconsideration, and thereafter the state board postponed the effective date of its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & PartiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Simpson v. Police Court of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. JUSTICE COURT OF VISTA TOWNSHIPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Koehn v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Walker v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.