Legal Opinion

Morton v. Pacific Construction Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1929No. Civil Nos. 2830, 2834PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action under our Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (chap. 10, Laws 1927), brought by the Pacific Construction Company “to settle and to afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity” a paving contract, entered into between plaintiff and defendant city of Phoenix, wherein the plaintiff has agreed to pave Second Street in said city, from the north line of Van Burén Street to the south line of McDowell Street.

The complaint sets out that the regular statutory requirements under the Street Improvement Act (chap. 13, title 7, Civ. Code 1913) for paving Second Street and the letting of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Miller v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Hopkins v. GroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API