Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clark v. Detroit Curling Club

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1941No. Docket No. 73, Calendar No. 41,567Published

1ConcurrenceSharpe, C. J.

I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Wiest. There was no merger or consolidation of the old corporation with the new corporation.

In Pingree v. Railroad Co., 118 Mich. 314, 338 (53 L. R. A. 274), we adopted the following definition of the term “consolidation”:

“ ‘The term “consolidation” is an elastic one, and may include a union of two or more corporations into a new one, with a different name, with or without extinguishing the constituent corporations, or the merger of two or more corporations into another existing corporation under the name of the latter.’ ” 2 Elliott on Railroads, § 335.

An…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kole v. LampenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Shadford v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Pingree v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Engel v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API