Lane-Wells Co. v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, P.J.—
We have here for decision whether the findings of the court are supported by the evidence; i. e. whether the licensor complied with its agreement whereby it might fix the minimum net prices to be charged by the licensee in using certain patented methods for logging oil wells.
Respondent, as owner of patented “systems and methods” for electrical logging of oil wells, was at all times herein mentioned, and had been, engaged in doing electrical logging by use of its patented methods some years prior to the contract with appellant. , By an unambiguous writing dated April 2, 1938, it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Scudder v. PerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Bradley Co. v. MulcrevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Ruth v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Alameda Produce Market, Inc. v. Air Nail Co. (In Re Air Nail Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.