Scudder v. Perce
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll. The question presented is the true construe tion of a partnership agreement. The facts found by the court, so far as necessary to this consideration, are that defendant was a physician and surgeon with an established practice in the town of Long Beach. He entered into a partnership agreement with plaintiff, who also was a physician and surgeon, but without practice in Long Beach. By the terms of the agreement the partnership was to continue until a given date when it became optional with either party to terminate the relationship.…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.