In re A.E.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Respondent father E.E. appeals an order of the trial court adjudicating his children, A.E. and J.E., neglected. E.E. argues in his appellate brief only that the trial court should not have relied upon the testimony of Dr. Robert McDonald. Since E.E. neither objected to that testimony at trial nor assigned error to that testimony or the findings of fact related to that testimony, E.E.'s arguments were not properly preserved for review by this Court. We, therefore, affirm.
Timeliness of Appeal
As an initial matter, we must address the guardian ad litem's motion to dismiss this appeal.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. Columbus County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Broderick v. BroderickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- In re P.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017