Legal Opinion
In Re Greyhound Lines, Inc. And the Greyhound Retirement and Disability Trust Fund
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1979No. 79-2260PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
This cause comes to us on petition for mandamus to the district court, seeking vacation of a remand order. That order reads, in pertinent part:
This cause is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to thé Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. Contemporaneously with his motion, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal of any federal claim under 29 U.S.C. § 185 contained in the third amended complaint.
Although federal court jurisdiction is not ousted when the basis for federal jurisdiction is subsequently removed from the proceedings, see Watkins v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Murphy v. KodzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Hazel Bishop, Inc. v. Perfemme, Inc. And Hazel BishopCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Theodore Watkins and Vivian Watkins v. William B. GroverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Brown v. Eastern States CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Snapper, Inc. v. RedanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Salveson v. Western States Bankcard Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.