Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
This tort action was removed from the Texas state courts to the United States District Court on the grounds of diversity of citizenship but was remanded as having been “improperly removed” when it seemed that there was not complete diversity among the parties. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, by mandamus, ordered the District Court to vacate its remand order because the latter had employed erroneous principles in concluding that it was without jurisdiction.
The Court of Appeals erred. Title 28 U. S. C. § 1447 (c) provides for remanding a removed action when the district court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3Cited by233 opinions
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Investors Life Insurance Company v. Waddell & Reed Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wight v. BankAmerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.