Legal Opinion

United States v. Hofus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2010No. 09-10076PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

MICHALE DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Terrance Hofus (“Hofus”) appeals his jury trial conviction for one count of attempting to coerce and entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). He contends the jury instructions inadequately defined the “substantial step” requirement and failed to require unanimity as to what constituted that substantial step. Hofus also argues that the district court erroneously excluded testimony from his expert that Hofus valued the sexual texting “in fantasy alone” and was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. KohringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  5. United States v. Raymond Ruiz, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API